Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
Date: 2025-01-16 05:06:27
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LWyWhs=sCaVPnpTOhSX5bRJrKPESM68dZVS18_E6z4=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 4:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> LGTM. I'll push this tomorrow unless there are more comments. I am
> planning to push this to HEAD as this is an improvement in existing
> docs and not any bug fix.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-01-16 05:13:08 Re: Make pg_stat_io view count IOs as bytes instead of blocks
Previous Message Zhang Mingli 2025-01-16 04:39:06 Inquiry About Determining Parallel Plans for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW