From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: logical replication worker accesses catalogs in error context callback |
Date: | 2021-01-28 05:44:03 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LWcu8A3YqNo-M0J=6fsOV3bF1bfeVVsuHxso3qFWRztw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 9:38 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 7:48 AM Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for pointing to the changes in the commit message. I corrected
> them. Attaching v4 patch set, consider it for further review.
>
About 0001, have we tried to reproduce the actual bug here which means
when the error_callback is called we should face some problem? I feel
with the correct testcase we should hit the Assert
(Assert(IsTransactionState());) in SearchCatCacheInternal because
there we expect the transaction to be in a valid state. I understand
that the transaction is in a broken state at that time but having a
testcase to hit the actual bug makes it easy to test the fix.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2021-01-28 05:52:12 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-01-28 05:43:50 | Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans |