Re: Enhance create subscription reference manual

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enhance create subscription reference manual
Date: 2024-10-14 04:27:46
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LUyN0bbBaAe7NMrHxXFKt6ncpMVXG1E2Fesgq09_DpXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 8:53 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > parameter in this case (it is an "optional" parameter, though). However,
> > when we refer to the stored catalog value, we should call it an option or
> > a property and calling it parameter is not suitable.
>
> Not sure. The stored catalog value of a subscription can be changed
> ALTER SUBSCRIPTION. In the ALTER SUBSCRIPTION manual, the placeholders
> for these properties are "parameter". So I think we should use
> "parameter" in this case at least for the stored catalog values of
> subscriptions.
>
> > If so, I feel that "the failover" in the following statement means
> > the catalog value (or the failover feature itself), so we should not
> > rewrite this to "the failover parameter".
>
> My conclusion is we should rewrite it as "the failover parameter" for
> the reason above.
>
> >> To initiate replication, you must manually create the replication slot,
> >> enable the failover if required, enable the subscription, and refresh the
> >> subscription.
> >
> > Instead, should we use "failover option"?
>

Sounds reasonable to me. Would you like to propose the patch with the
changes you have in mind?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Regina Obe 2024-10-14 05:16:54 mingw64 built pg_sphere not loadable in VC++ PostgreSQL builds - double_to_shortest_decimal_buf
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-10-14 03:57:08 Re: Remove obsolete comment in reorderbuffer.h