From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pluggable storage |
Date: | 2017-08-08 04:21:12 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LDS6H2gS222sY2niQ7F1UTVBRppEZbCWotwWrdbhCUhw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I have sent the partial patch I have to Hari Babu Kommi. We expect that
>> he will be able to further this goal some more.
>
>
> Thanks Alvaro for sharing your development patch.
>
> Most of the patch design is same as described by Alvaro in the first mail
> [1].
> I will detail the modifications, pending items and open items (needs
> discussion)
> to implement proper pluggable storage.
>
> Here I attached WIP patches to support pluggable storage. The patch series
> are may not work individually. Still so many things are under development.
> These patches are just to share the approach of the current development.
>
+typedef struct StorageAmRoutine
+{
In this structure, you have already covered most of the API's that a
new storage module needs to provide, but I think there could be more.
One such API could be heap_hot_search. This seems specific to current
heap where we have the provision of HOT. I think we can provide a new
API tuple_search or something like that.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-08-08 04:29:21 | Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order |
Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2017-08-08 03:19:49 | Re: Notice message of ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... RERESH PUBLICATIION |