On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:01 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> If we want to stick to --database= supporting a pattern looks better
> than just a single special pattern *.
>
This sounds reasonable to me as well. Note that the interaction of
other parameters like --replication-slot is not yet discussed. I think
if the number of slots given matches with the number of databases
fetched based on pattern matches then we can use them otherwise,
return the ERROR. The other option could be that we don't allow
options like --replication-slot along with pattern matching option.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.