Re: typos

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: typos
Date: 2023-01-10 08:25:56
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KgRPZr-2_LxAgeNCxmwnvN2nGVazoNNV1B_4SY9f=uSQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:18 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:24:40PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Thanks for noticing this. I'll take care of this and some other typo
> > patches together.
>
> Does this include 0010? I was just looking at the whole set and this
> one looked like a cleanup worth on its own so I was going to handle
> it, until I saw your update. If you are also looking at that, I won't
> stand in your way, of course :)
>

I have not yet started, so please go ahead.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

  • Re: typos at 2023-01-10 07:48:07 from Michael Paquier

Responses

  • Re: typos at 2023-01-11 06:26:10 from Michael Paquier

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-01-10 08:29:03 Re: Add a new pg_walinspect function to extract FPIs from WAL records
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-10 07:57:43 Re: Avoiding "wrong tuple length" errors at the end of VACUUM on pg_database update (Backpatch of 947789f to v12 and v13)