Re: Separate GUC for replication origins

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Separate GUC for replication origins
Date: 2025-03-06 09:55:23
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KV7wgct11MPgC=6M3AMH+tK0wSNpfR7YDGcYh7Wgax+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 4:38 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 11.02.25 21:25, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > Here is another patch that only changes the GUC name to
> > max_replication_origin_sessions.
>
> I think the naming and description of this is still confusing.
>
...
...
>
> I agree that the originally proposed name max_replication_origins is not
> good, because you can "create" (using pg_replication_origin_create())
> more than the configured maximum. What is the term for what the setting
> actually controls? How many are "active"? "In use"? Per session? etc.
>

It controls the number of active sessions using origin. The idea is
that to track replication progress via replication_origin we need to
do replorigin_session_setup(). If you look in the code, we have used
the term replorigin_session* in many places, so we thought of naming
this as max_replication_origin_sessions. But the other options could
be max_active_replication_origins or max_replication_origins_in_use.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Ford 2025-03-06 09:57:30 Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
Previous Message Emre Hasegeli 2025-03-06 09:25:01 Trivial comment fix for tsquerysend()