Re: doc review for parallel vacuum

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc review for parallel vacuum
Date: 2020-04-10 07:26:08
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JwUXkV4T2uAiLDYHT3efqkX2gE+Z5Z8g-DgCw377LN_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:49 PM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 13:55, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> I don't have comments on your change other than the comments Amit
> already sent. Thank you for reviewing this part!
>

I have made the modifications as per my comments. What do you think
about the attached?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Comments-and-doc-fixes-for-commit-40d964ec99.patch application/octet-stream 14.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Khandekar 2020-04-10 07:39:13 spin_delay() for ARM
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-04-10 07:04:16 Re: Function to track shmem reinit time