| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
| Date: | 2024-09-02 09:50:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JaSJGBYEpm2kYLw9ocYpy4CcK3Bu-kHeEAcafSnk5tbQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 1:45 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Please find the attached v44 patch with the above changes. I will
> include the 0002 xid_age based invalidation patch later.
>
It is better to get the 0001 reviewed and committed first. We can
discuss about 0002 afterwards as 0001 is in itself a complete and
separate patch that can be committed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-09-02 10:02:24 | Re: Invalid Assert while validating REPLICA IDENTITY? |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-09-02 09:28:32 | Re: Collect statistics about conflicts in logical replication |