Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (SXD Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajendra Kumar Dangwal <dangwalrajendra888(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "euler(at)eulerto(dot)com" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Date: 2025-01-28 08:58:51
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JUZFOiMpg5R8SJp=0w+zE15bOP+HxFbfmL29CjyUy1aw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 9:58 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>

I have pushed the remaining part of this patch. Now, we can review the
proposed documentation part.

I feel we don't need the Examples sub-section for this part of the
docs. The behavior is quite clear from the "Behavior Summary"
sub-section table. Also, I don't find the sub-sections 29.6.1 and
29.6.2 are worth mentioning as separate sub-chapters.

*
+ non-PostgreSQL database via plugin output,

In the above sentence, shouldn't it be 'output plugin' instead of
'plugin output'? We use that way at other places in the docs.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2025-01-28 09:02:32 Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-01-28 08:42:38 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes