From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | ojford(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | krasiyan(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, david(at)fetter(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options |
Date: | 2025-01-28 09:02:32 |
Message-ID: | 20250128.180232.1596242435813112534.ishii@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> +/*
>> + * ignorenulls_getfuncarginframe
>> + * For IGNORE NULLS, get the next nonnull value in the frame, moving forward or backward
>> + * until we find a value or reach the frame's end.
>> + */
>> +static Datum
>> +ignorenulls_getfuncarginframe(WindowObject winobj, int argno,
>>
>> Do you assume that win_nonnulls is sorted by pos? I think it's
>> necessarily true that pos in win_nonnulls array is sorted. Is that ok?
>
> Yes it must be sorted on my understanding of the code.
Then the patch has a problem. I ran a query below and examined
win_nonnulls. It seems it was not sorted out.
SELECT
x,y,
nth_value(y,1) IGNORE NULLS OVER w
FROM (VALUES (1,1), (2,2), (3,NULL), (4,4), (5,NULL), (6,6), (7,7)) AS t(x,y)
WINDOW w AS (ORDER BY x ROWS BETWEEN 1 PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING EXCLUDE CURRENT ROW);
(gdb) p *winobj->win_nonnulls @ winobj->nonnulls_len
$8 = {1, 0, 3, 6, 5}
Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2025-01-28 09:38:57 | RE: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-01-28 08:58:51 | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |