Re: [BUG] "FailedAssertion" reported when streaming in logical replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] "FailedAssertion" reported when streaming in logical replication
Date: 2021-04-27 07:25:01
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JSw7Hv2OXstpe5RccCTuUMExb61cLAPv1bFPNXtOZHmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:22 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:05 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > Can't we use 'txns_by_base_snapshot_lsn' list for this purpose? It is
> > > > ensured in ReorderBufferSetBaseSnapshot that we always assign
> > > > base_snapshot to a top-level transaction if the current is a known
> > > > subxact. I think that will be true because we always form xid-subxid
> > > > relation before processing each record in
> > > > LogicalDecodingProcessRecord.
> > >
> > > Yeah, we can do that, but here we are only interested in top
> > > transactions and this list will give us sub-transaction as well so we
> > > will have to skip it in the below if condition.
> > >
> >
> > I am not so sure about this point. I have explained above why I think
> > there won't be any subtransactions in this. Can you please let me know
> > what am I missing if anything?
>
> Got your point, yeah this will only have top transactions so we can
> use this. I will change this in the next patch. In fact we can put
> an assert that it should not be an sub transaction?
>

Right. It is good to have an assert.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2021-04-27 07:34:30 Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Andrey V. Lepikhov 2021-04-27 06:57:30 Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.