From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Date: | 2021-04-10 12:54:15 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JRn5tT8uLL=nLT-PRRcvJi6BXVWJ-kv86E+q5rEY9rpA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:06 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Amit for your Patch. I have merged your changes into my
> patchset. I did not find any issues in my testing.
> Thoughts?
>
0001
------
PgStat_Counter m_stream_bytes;
+ PgStat_Counter m_total_txns;
+ PgStat_Counter m_total_bytes;
} PgStat_MsgReplSlot;
..
..
+ PgStat_Counter total_txns;
+ PgStat_Counter total_bytes;
TimestampTz stat_reset_timestamp;
} PgStat_ReplSlotStats;
Doesn't this change belong to the second patch?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2021-04-10 13:21:32 | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2021-04-10 12:53:28 | Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals |