From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |
Date: | 2022-07-18 04:52:50 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JCsrf=ACpmgnsiQZHQNqSfJmiJi2JE7Zjm2updYjUP9A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:29 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I think giving two options would be really confusing from the
> usability perspective. I think what we should be doing here is to
> keep these three names 'none', 'any' and 'local' as reserved names for
> the origin name so that those are not allowed to be set by the user
> and they have some internal meaning.
>
This makes sense to me. I think we can avoid reserving 'local' for now
till we agree on its use case and implementation. One similar point
about slots is that we treat 'none' slot_name in subscription commands
as a special value indicating no slot name whereas we do allow
creating a slot with the name 'none' with
pg_create_logical_replication_slot(). So, if we want to follow a
similar convention here, we may not need to add any restriction for
origin names but personally, I think it is better to add such a
restriction to avoid confusion and in fact, as a separate patch we
should even disallow creating slot name as 'none'.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2022-07-18 05:48:51 | Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-18 04:33:45 | Re: Windows now has fdatasync() |