From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Callahan, Drew" <callaan(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Potential data loss due to race condition during logical replication slot creation |
Date: | 2024-07-10 03:43:27 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1J0V5qcCPUQaPSy8w+GbuUQnxhU_51rOZ27SFqeRfGJyg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 7:52 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Overall I think the patches are in good shape, so I'm going to push
> them tomorrow, barring any objections and further comments.
>
Agreed. Below are a few minor comments that you might want to consider:
1.
@@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ extern SnapBuildState
SnapBuildCurrentState(SnapBuild *builder);
extern Snapshot SnapBuildGetOrBuildSnapshot(SnapBuild *builder);
extern bool SnapBuildXactNeedsSkip(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr ptr);
+extern void SnapBuildSetFindStartPoint(SnapBuild *builder, bool
find_start_point);
This is not required in the latest version.
2.
+ /*
+ * Indicates if we are using the snapshot builder for the initial creation
+ * of a logical replication slot.
The word 'initial' in the above comment is not required. If you
consider this then a similar wording change is required in lower
branches as well.
3.
HEAD and v17
---------------------
- /* b) valid on disk state and not building full snapshot */
+
+ /*
+ * b) valid on disk state and while neither building full snapshot nor
+ * finding the start point.
+ */
else if (!builder->building_full_snapshot &&
+ !builder->in_slot_creation &&
V16 and below
---------------------
- /* b) valid on disk state and not building full snapshot */
+
+ /*
+ * b) valid on disk state and neither building full snapshot nor while
+ * creating a slot.
+ */
else if (!builder->building_full_snapshot &&
+ !ctx->in_create &&
Isn't it better to use the same comment in both places?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-07-10 05:30:55 | Re: Potential data loss due to race condition during logical replication slot creation |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-07-10 02:21:48 | Re: Potential data loss due to race condition during logical replication slot creation |