Re: speed up a logical replica setup

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Date: 2024-07-12 05:40:52
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J+s1+GSg_fz-85407o24ASrRm=x+p-_JHQHr34iJ9rjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 7:04 PM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 8:22 AM, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
>
> The analysis and suggestion look reasonable to me.
> Here is a small patch which does the same.
>
>
> LGTM. However, I would add a comment above the INSERT you moved around to remind
> you that a transaction cannot be added there because it will break this test.
>

Pushed after adding a comment.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2024-07-12 05:41:08 Re: Optimize WindowAgg's use of tuplestores
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-07-12 05:21:09 Re: Allow non-superuser to cancel superuser tasks.