Re: speed up a logical replica setup

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Alexander Lakhin" <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Date: 2024-07-11 13:34:04
Message-ID: 9ee2d69a-62e1-4a79-91b1-d65580b53547@app.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 8:22 AM, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> The analysis and suggestion look reasonable to me.
> Here is a small patch which does the same.

LGTM. However, I would add a comment above the INSERT you moved around to remind
you that a transaction cannot be added there because it will break this test.

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-07-11 13:40:58 Re: Redundant syscache access in get_rel_sync_entry()
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-07-11 13:29:08 Re: Pluggable cumulative statistics