From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Sjöblom <robert(dot)sjoblom(at)fortnox(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [DOC] Update ALTER SUBSCRIPTION documentation v3 |
Date: | 2023-06-17 06:33:22 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+yx10f3dxnr9GJAst_AC3b2ZUd5qA4_bTV=LbOvmFcaQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 7:15 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 15.06.23 04:49, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > Now, along with this change, there is a change in errhint as well
> > which I am not sure about whether to backpatch or not. I think we have
> > the following options (a) commit both doc and code change in HEAD (b)
> > commit both doc and code change in v17 when the next version branch
> > opens (c) backpatch the doc change and commit the code change in HEAD
> > only (d) backpatch the doc change and commit the code change in v17
> > (e) backpatch both the doc and code change.
>
> Reading the thread again now, I think this is essentially a bug fix, so
> I don't mind backpatching it.
>
> I wish the errhint would show the actual command to disable the
> subscription. It already shows the command to detach the replication
> slot, so it would only be consistent to also show the other command.
>
Fair enough. I updated the errhint and slightly adjusted the docs as
well in the attached.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
logical_replication_slot_disable_doc_update_v5.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-06-17 09:44:51 | Re: Subscription statistics are not dropped at DROP SUBSCRIPTION in some cases |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-06-17 05:54:35 | Re: pg_collation.collversion for C.UTF-8 |