From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION |
Date: | 2023-12-08 11:45:00 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+tSQ39gVAFcMPpK=TMbOm75P8uUcAhZQZc1ednmdamog@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:21 AM Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I mean to commit the open transaction at the below place in
> > wait_for_relation_state_change()
> >
> > wait_for_relation_state_change()
> > {
> > ...
> > -- commit the xact
> > WaitLatch();
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Then start after the wait is over. This is just to test whether it
> > improves the difference in regression test timing.
>
> I tried the above approach and observed that the performance of this
> approach is nearly same as the previous approach.
>
Then let's go with the original patch only. BTW, it took almost the
same time (105 wallclock secs) in my environment (CentOs VM) to run
tests in src/test/subscription both with and without the patch. I took
a median of five runs. I have slightly adjusted the comments and
commit message in the attached. If you are fine with this, we can
commit and backpatch this.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Fix-an-undetected-deadlock-due-to-apply-worker.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Charan K | 2023-12-08 12:04:56 | Assistance Needed: PostgreSQL Migration Errors 13.2 to 15 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-12-08 11:44:38 | Remove some unnecessary includes of "access/xlog_internal.h" |