Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much?

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much?
Date: 2024-02-23 03:47:51
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+oz4GHePO0OFkTP6u1t1xRP0LpPW7MULxH2ufk8r0TdA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:46 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 08:42, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > To resolve the BF
> > > failure, I still feel, we should just recreate the subscription. This
> > > is a pre-existing problem and we can track it via a separate patch
> > > with a test case targetting such failures.
> >
> > +1 for going with recreation of the subscription, the changes for this
> > are available at [1].
> > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1hLZW4H4Z61swK6WPW6pcNcjzXqw%3D6NqG7e-RMtkFaZA%40mail.gmail.com
> >
>
> Tom, and others, does anyone still object to going ahead with an idea
> by just changing the test to recreate the subscription to silence BF
> failures for this test?
>

Seeing no objections, I have pushed the required test changes to silence the BF.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2024-02-23 04:13:48 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-02-23 03:23:49 Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR