| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |
| Date: | 2021-11-02 04:57:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+N4wohO8Nt80oNRWVSaC9NRtATpP=_vb5yQuRcQCKW+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 6:43 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I am just not sure if it is worth adding
> > such a view or we leave it to users to find that information via
> > querying individual views or system tables for objects.
>
> I've not looked at the patch for logical replication of sequences but
> the view becomes more useful once we support the new type of
> replication object? If so, we can consider this view again after the
> patch gets committed.
>
+1.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-11-02 05:24:07 | Re: archive modules |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-11-02 04:48:14 | Re: Portability report: ninja |