| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Portability report: ninja |
| Date: | 2021-11-02 04:48:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1341951.1635828494@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2021-11-01 15:25:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Fortunately for my
>> purposes here, it seems to work with fairly old Python --- I built
>> successfully with python 2.6.2, though not with 2.4.1.
> meson will need a newer python though...
Yup. I was just trying to establish what the lower bound was for
ninja, since they (ahem) don't document it.
The meson docs say it needs Python >= 3.6, which I think is going
to be an issue, but I've not researched it yet. What I was mainly
curious about today was whether anything using ninja as the backend
could meet our portability goals. My mind's more or less at ease
on that, but I am afraid that requiring 3.6 is going to be a problem
on LTS distributions. That's a topic for another thread though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-11-02 04:57:15 | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-11-02 04:43:54 | Re: archive modules |