From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.5 release notes |
Date: | 2015-06-13 02:55:55 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+C2Yji4WLFOwGia6J4kdcTurcidx-btj2i5K7wfk3mPA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:02:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/10/2015 09:50 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > Also shall we mention about below in Migrations to 9.5 section
> > >
> > > "pg_basebackup will not not work in tar mode against 9.4 and older
> > servers,
> > > as we have introduced a new protocol option in that mode."
> >
> > AFAIK, pg_basebackup has never worked across versions. So there's
no
> > reason for this note.
> >
> >
> > It has. The resulting backup has not been usable cross version, but
> > pg_basebackup itself has. Though not always, and I'm not sure we've ever
> > claimed it was supported, but it has worked.
>
> So we should still mention it in the release notes?
>
If it has never lead to usable backup's for cross version backup, then I
think
there is no pressing need to mention it.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-06-13 03:32:44 | Re: Collection of memory leaks for ECPG driver |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-06-13 02:34:42 | Re: 9.5 release notes |