Re: 9.5 release notes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.5 release notes
Date: 2015-06-13 02:55:55
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+C2Yji4WLFOwGia6J4kdcTurcidx-btj2i5K7wfk3mPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:02:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/10/2015 09:50 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > Also shall we mention about below in Migrations to 9.5 section
> > >
> > > "pg_basebackup will not not work in tar mode against 9.4 and older
> > servers,
> > > as we have introduced a new protocol option in that mode."
> >
> > AFAIK, pg_basebackup has never worked across versions. So there's
no
> > reason for this note.
> >
> >
> > It has. The resulting backup has not been usable cross version, but
> > pg_basebackup itself has. Though not always, and I'm not sure we've ever
> > claimed it was supported, but it has worked.
>
> So we should still mention it in the release notes?
>

If it has never lead to usable backup's for cross version backup, then I
think
there is no pressing need to mention it.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-06-13 03:32:44 Re: Collection of memory leaks for ECPG driver
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-06-13 02:34:42 Re: 9.5 release notes