Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message
Date: 2022-06-30 08:19:53
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+3KpN-GC5Up4cFgsKEto1s4pXxS=qR_H7mJbg_Zx5tpA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:58 PM Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>
> Op 29-06-2022 om 15:00 schreef Amit Kapila:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2022-06-26 Su 11:44, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> >>> JSON/SQL jsonpath
> >>>
> >>> For example, a jsonpath string with deliberate typo 'like_regexp'
> >>> (instead of 'like_regex'):
> >>>
> >>> select js
> >>> from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js)
> >>> where js @? '$ ? (@ like_regexp "^xxx")';
> >>>
> >>> ERROR: syntax error, unexpected IDENT_P at or near " " of jsonpath input
> >>> LINE 1: ...s from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js) where js @? '$ ? (@
> >>> li...
> >>>
> >>> Both 'IDENT_P' and 'at or near " "' seem pretty useless.
> >>>
>
> > removing this. One thing that is not clear to me is why OP sees an
> > acceptable message (ERROR: syntax error, unexpected invalid token at
> > or near "=" of jsonpath input) for a similar query in 14?
>
> To mention that was perhaps unwise of me because The IDENT_P (or more
> generally, *_P) messages can be provoked on 14 too.
>

Okay, then I think it is better to backpatch this fix.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2022-06-30 08:21:18 Re: Strange failures on chipmunk
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-06-30 08:16:24 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs