From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message |
Date: | 2022-07-03 21:28:34 |
Message-ID: | 01db0c10-a445-15f7-32a5-bdc7c0073179@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-06-30 Th 04:19, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:58 PM Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> Op 29-06-2022 om 15:00 schreef Amit Kapila:
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> On 2022-06-26 Su 11:44, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>>>> JSON/SQL jsonpath
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, a jsonpath string with deliberate typo 'like_regexp'
>>>>> (instead of 'like_regex'):
>>>>>
>>>>> select js
>>>>> from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js)
>>>>> where js @? '$ ? (@ like_regexp "^xxx")';
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: syntax error, unexpected IDENT_P at or near " " of jsonpath input
>>>>> LINE 1: ...s from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js) where js @? '$ ? (@
>>>>> li...
>>>>>
>>>>> Both 'IDENT_P' and 'at or near " "' seem pretty useless.
>>>>>
>>> removing this. One thing that is not clear to me is why OP sees an
>>> acceptable message (ERROR: syntax error, unexpected invalid token at
>>> or near "=" of jsonpath input) for a similar query in 14?
>> To mention that was perhaps unwise of me because The IDENT_P (or more
>> generally, *_P) messages can be provoked on 14 too.
>>
> Okay, then I think it is better to backpatch this fix.
Done.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-03 21:41:31 | Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-03 21:28:22 | Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions |