From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajendra Kumar Dangwal <dangwalrajendra888(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, euler(at)eulerto(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |
Date: | 2024-11-06 04:26:18 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+0CC3KvB-SAEo0E4=HZtEZ4LmuTYt55_SFub7k3Ub6eg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 7:34 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh,
>
> Here are my review comments for patch v49-0001.
>
I have a question on the display of this new parameter.
postgres=# \dRp+
Publication pub_gen
Owner | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via
root | Generated columns
----------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-------------------
KapilaAm | f | t | t | t | t | f | t
Tables:
"public.test_gen"
The current theory for the display of the "Generated Columns" option
could be that let's add new parameters at the end which sounds
reasonable. The other way to look at it is how it would be easier for
users to interpret. I think the value of the "Via root" option should
be either after "All tables" or at the end as that is higher level
table information than operations or column-level information. As
currently, it is at the end, so "Generated Columns" should be added
before.
Thoughts?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Hill | 2024-11-06 04:29:37 | Building Postgres 17.0 with meson |
Previous Message | wenhui qiu | 2024-11-06 03:44:46 | Re: optimize the value of vacthresh and anlthresh |