From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |
Date: | 2014-10-25 09:50:47 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv6NwHiqiWC8ssFeur7Z8G4=72HLU-BToHkfW-NAzOr8vA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> writes:
> > Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends
> > you found.
>
> Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses what
> seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation, and
> contains assorted other code cleanup. I have not touched the
> documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains the
> old syntax. I have to stop working on this now, because I've already
> expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious
> problems mentioned in
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/16787.1351053391@sss.pgh.pa.us
> and
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28389.1351094795@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF.
>
Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage?
--
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ali Akbar | 2014-10-25 10:20:18 | Re: Function array_agg(array) |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-10-25 08:43:07 | Re: Function array_agg(array) |