From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |
Date: | 2014-10-25 12:28:26 |
Message-ID: | 20141025122826.GP1791@alvin.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thom Brown wrote:
> On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> writes:
> > > Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends
> > > you found.
> >
> > Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses what
> > seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation, and
> > contains assorted other code cleanup. I have not touched the
> > documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains the
> > old syntax. I have to stop working on this now, because I've already
> > expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious
> > problems mentioned in
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/16787.1351053391@sss.pgh.pa.us
> > and
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28389.1351094795@sss.pgh.pa.us
> >
> > I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF.
> >
>
> Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage?
Not in this room. Do you?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-10-25 12:46:33 | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-10-25 12:22:19 | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |