From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 |
Date: | 2012-02-28 15:14:29 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv43Ka8P0oF5-+L3qkHnd6cFgMPNL+Z4ag-Va2+T6QiDEQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 February 2012 15:03, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
>> Well the problem is that you can add commands to a trigger en masse,
>> but you can only remove them one at a time. Couldn't we at least
>> allow the removal of multiple commands at the same time? The docs you
>> wrote suggest you can do this, but you can't.
>
> This seems over-complicated. Triggers on tables do not have alterable
> properties, why should command triggers? I vote for
>
> CREATE COMMAND TRIGGER name ... properties ...;
>
> DROP COMMAND TRIGGER name;
>
> full stop. If you want to run the same trigger function on some more
> commands, add another trigger name.
This would make more sense, particularly since dropping a command
trigger, as it stands, doesn't necessarily drop the trigger.
--
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-02-28 15:27:36 | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-28 15:14:19 | Re: FDW system columns |