Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date: 2012-02-28 15:27:36
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYRuRUXQ8VKCCts=XVj+OMDcuZum7ShDSwKoTpZV2=isQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Could we name this "postgresql_fdw" instead?  We already have several
> ${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of
> having to guess variant spellings.

If you don't like variant spellings, having anything to do with
PostgreSQL, aka Postgres, and usually discussed on the pgsql-* mailing
lists, is probably a bad idea.

Go Postgre!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-02-28 16:02:27 Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Previous Message Thom Brown 2012-02-28 15:14:29 Re: Command Triggers, patch v11