Re: encode/decode support for base64url

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:08 AM Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:51 AM Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca> wrote:
>
>> > Oh well - you're probably right.
>> > I guess I was blinded by my convenience.
>> > Adding a 'base64url' option there is more appropriate.
>>
>> I agree with it too. It is neater to add "base64url" as a new option for
>> encode() and decode() SQL functions in encode.c.
>>
>
> Attaching a v2 with that.
>
>>
>> In addition, you may also want to add the C versions of base64rul encode
>> and decode functions to "src/common/base64.c" as new API calls so that
>> the frontend, backend applications and extensions can also have access
>> to these base64url conversions.
>>
>>
> We could expose this in base64.c - it'll need some more checking
> A few more test cases, especially around padding, are necessary.
> I'll come back to this.
>

Here's a v3 with some (hopefully) better test cases.