| From: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2023-07-11 05:52:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+renyXKiEY1ZDZw3Vit0=5-v_=QmYVzt5+66Xqu_1uaUF4Sdw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:06 AM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:05 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what value we would get from testing this with btree_gist,
> > but if we wanted to do that, then adding a new test file to the
> > btree_gist sql/ directory would seem reasonable to me.
> >
> > (I would make the test a little bit bigger than you had shown, like
> > insert a few values.)
> >
> > If you want to do that, please send another patch. Otherwise, I'm ok to
> > commit this one.
>
> I can get you a patch tonight or tomorrow. I think it's worth it since
> btree_gist uses different strategy numbers than ordinary gist.
Patch attached.
Regards,
Paul
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v5-0001-Allow-some-exclusion-constraints-on-partitions.patch | application/octet-stream | 26.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-07-11 05:54:26 | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-07-11 05:47:45 | Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table. |