| From: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2023-07-10 15:06:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+renyVP0MPh-7cK=wSLoStHPFQX3LMPiYitvOwJKfqbS7ETDA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:05 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> I'm not sure what value we would get from testing this with btree_gist,
> but if we wanted to do that, then adding a new test file to the
> btree_gist sql/ directory would seem reasonable to me.
>
> (I would make the test a little bit bigger than you had shown, like
> insert a few values.)
>
> If you want to do that, please send another patch. Otherwise, I'm ok to
> commit this one.
I can get you a patch tonight or tomorrow. I think it's worth it since
btree_gist uses different strategy numbers than ordinary gist.
Thanks!
Paul
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-07-10 15:09:44 | Re: PATCH: Using BRIN indexes for sorted output |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-07-10 15:04:48 | Re: Add more sanity checks around callers of changeDependencyFor() |