Re: Add support for AT LOCAL

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Date: 2023-10-16 02:53:56
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLYaVJ7df+Uu=ctUunRcqUsGY55feVQa-1pzz1=PT=z3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 2:58 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Another theory would be one of these weird compiler optimization issue
> from xlc? In recent history, there was 8d2a01ae12cd.

Yeah, there are more like that too. xlc 12.1 is dead (like the OS
version it shipped with). New versions are available on cfarm if we
care about this target. But I am conscious of the cosmic law that if
you blame the compiler too soon you can cause the bug to move into
your code...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-10-16 03:02:45 Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-16 02:47:22 Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag