From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces |
Date: | 2022-03-17 03:34:30 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGL2uaRKu=3+bMBpejHh4k7wqzWC05aiasTsSsHGRCWa8g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:53 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 05:15:58PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > I'm not sure that the "of the symbolic link in pg_tblspc/" is
> > needed. And allow_in_place_tablespaces alone doesn't create in-place
> > tablespace. So this might need rethink at least for the second point.
>
> Surely this can be improved. I was not satisfied with this paragraph
> after re-reading it this morning, so I have just removed it, rewording
> slightly the part for in-place tablespaces that is still necessary.
+ <para>
+ A relative path to the data directory is returned for tablespaces
+ created when <xref linkend="guc-allow-in-place-tablespaces"/> is
+ enabled.
+ </para>
+ </entry>
I think what Horiguchi-san was pointing out above is that you need to
enable the GUC *and* say LOCATION '', which the new paragraph doesn't
capture. What do you think about this:
A path relative to the data directory is returned for in-place
tablespaces (see <xref ...>).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2022-03-17 04:04:03 | Re: Window Function "Run Conditions" |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-03-17 03:29:53 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |