Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Date: 2025-03-25 08:41:21
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKs-QSkM-AnmU55aSrxxrYEDA9A4YoNaE4t4ma-3CAFYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 6:00 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> I agree with your patch 0001-Deprecate-pg_int64.patch. I don't see a
> reason to keep the current arrangement around pg_int64.

Thanks for looking! Pushed.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-03-25 09:32:52 Re: Add estimated hit ratio to Memoize in EXPLAIN to explain cost adjustment
Previous Message Bykov Ivan 2025-03-25 08:14:44 RE: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET