Re: v17 vs v16 performance comparison

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: v17 vs v16 performance comparison
Date: 2024-09-03 06:21:59
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKjPM6H2un=EwVfMMGXZeDZfwCJOYOB1omxnJOHBoHDqA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 5:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> From a bird's eye view, new v17-vs-v16 comparison has only 87 "worse",
> while the previous one had 115 (it requires deeper analysis, of course, but
> still...).

Any chance you could share that whole pgdata dir with me, assuming it
compresses to a manageable size? Perhaps we could discuss that
off-list?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-09-03 06:25:53 Re: Expand applicability of aggregate's sortop optimization
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-09-03 06:15:29 Re: Add const qualifiers to XLogRegister*() functions