| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <tmunro(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Test replay of regression tests, attempt II. |
| Date: | 2022-01-17 17:42:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKU=tiZoE7vp7qYFQNPdBd2pHoaOwkPMDg9YWk1h=FtmQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:24 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I'm quite appalled that this patch has apparently added an entire new run
> > of the core regression tests to the standard check-world/buildfarm cycle.
I wonder if there is a good way to share the resulting data directory
with the pg_upgrade test.
> These files should have been put into the tmp_check directory...
> that's what it's for.
Yeah, I mentioned this problem on the thread and was about to update
the clean target to remove them, but this sounds like a better idea.
Will fix.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-01-17 18:30:27 | pgsql: Avoid calling strerror[_r] in PQcancel(). |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-01-17 17:24:48 | Re: pgsql: Test replay of regression tests, attempt II. |