From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Array initialisation notation in syscache.c |
Date: | 2023-11-14 04:31:57 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKK2oPsfogi0pukLAcnLUgmNWpPaQMAMtVd8ddiRPRhOQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 8:19 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> On 31.03.23 04:16, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > From the light relief department, here is some more variadic macrology:
> >
> > - tp = SearchSysCache1(TSPARSEROID, ObjectIdGetDatum(prsId));
> > + tp = SearchSysCache(TSPARSEROID, ObjectIdGetDatum(prsId));
>
> I'm worried that if we are removing the variants with the explicit
> numbers, it will make it difficult for extensions to maintain
> compatibility with previous PG major versions. They would probably have
> to copy much of your syscache.h changes into their own code. Seems messy.
I suppose we could also supply a set of macros with the numbers that
map straight onto the numberless ones, with a note that they will be
deleted after N releases. But maybe not worth the hassle for such a
tiny improvement in core code readability. I will withdraw this
entry. Thanks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-11-14 04:40:14 | Re: Fix output of zero privileges in psql |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2023-11-14 04:28:22 | Re: trying again to get incremental backup |