From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | btfujiitkp <btfujiitkp(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |
Date: | 2020-01-28 05:05:24 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKAtuJsqEMMc6VASgD=YtkM-BUqJYgZi6DAOknaBfT5Ag@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:56 AM Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/30/19 5:14 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 12:22 PM Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> These two patches (v3) no longer apply cleanly. Could you please
> >> rebase?
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> > Thanks. Here's v4.
>
> Thanks, Thomas.
>
> The new patches apply cleanly and pass 'installcheck'.
I rebased, fixed the "xid_snapshot_xip" problem spotted by Takao Fujii
that I had missed earlier, updated a couple of error messages to refer
to the new names (even when using the old functions) and ran
check-world and some simple manual tests on an -m32 build just to be
paranoid. Here are the versions of these patches I'd like to commit.
Does anyone want to object to the txid/xid8 type punning scheme or
long term txid-sunsetting plan?
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Add-SQL-type-xid8-to-expose-FullTransactionId-to--v5.patch | application/octet-stream | 14.4 KB |
0002-Introduce-xid8-variants-of-the-txid_XXX-fmgr-func-v5.patch | application/octet-stream | 33.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-01-28 05:36:33 | Some incorrect option sizes for PQconninfoOption in libpq |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-01-28 05:01:55 | Re: pause recovery if pitr target not reached |