Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?

From: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: btfujiitkp <btfujiitkp(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Date: 2019-12-02 17:55:59
Message-ID: 7c41eeac-c74d-cd83-4430-78ae96a50d25@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/30/19 5:14 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 12:22 PM Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> These two patches (v3) no longer apply cleanly. Could you please
>> rebase?
>
> Hi Mark,
> Thanks. Here's v4.

Thanks, Thomas.

The new patches apply cleanly and pass 'installcheck'.

--
Mark Dilger

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-12-02 18:06:24 Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-12-02 17:51:26 Re: Update minimum SSL version