On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:27 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Yeah, this rings a bell. I never went back to it even if the thing
> looks rather clean at quick glance (not tested), but I may be able
> to spend some cycles on that. I don't think that's critical enough
> for a backpatch, so doing something only on HEAD is fine by me.
> What's your take?
I haven't heard any user complaints, and I'd personally be happy with
a fix on master only.