Re: Add support for AT LOCAL

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Date: 2023-10-16 03:07:20
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJSEOVonGsYCiuhZXsBFCxXtjNyHGYvn-w9jykGo2PgqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm having a hard time not believing that this is a compiler bug.
> Looking back at 8d2a01ae12cd and its speculation that xlc is overly
> liberal about reordering code around sequence points ... I wonder
> if it'd help to do this calculation in a local variable, and only
> assign the final value to result->time ? But we have to reproduce
> the problem first.

If that can be shown I would vote for switching to /opt/IBM/xlc/16.1.0
and not changing a single bit of PostgreSQL.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message zhihuifan1213 2023-10-16 03:09:50 UniqueKey v2
Previous Message Erik Wienhold 2023-10-16 03:03:18 Re: Patch: Improve Boolean Predicate JSON Path Docs