Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
Date: 2023-05-15 03:22:29
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+aGHzgE4-FftnQmpkQ7719yrY3qj5M3y-ieMxYq8+q1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:57 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:08:32PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > After 495ed0e, do these references to Windows SDK 8.1 still make sense?

> As listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_SDK,
> likely not. What do you think about the attached?

LGTM.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirk Wolak 2023-05-15 04:32:54 PSQL Should \sv & \ev work with materialized views?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-05-15 03:10:56 Re: Overhauling "Routine Vacuuming" docs, particularly its handling of freezing