Re: Regression tests vs SERIALIZABLE

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Regression tests vs SERIALIZABLE
Date: 2021-03-15 10:51:13
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+G_MR6f6T+Ncd_jfei0M4za1usr7iDM50D0OYDTuH+1g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:24 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> However, since commit 862ef372d6b, there *is* one test that fails if
> you run make installcheck against a cluster running with -c
> default_transaction_isolation=serializable: transaction.sql. Is that
> a mistake? Is it a goal to be able to run this test suite against all
> 3 isolation levels?

Here's a fix.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-transaction.sql-tests-in-higher-isolation-levels.patch text/x-patch 2.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2021-03-15 10:57:45 Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2021-03-15 10:37:02 Re: Extensions not dumped when --schema is used