From: | Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication |
Date: | 2020-10-12 11:11:32 |
Message-ID: | CA+fd4k5Dzrg0aQ0_N=c6ivAJNwdGi2AJm4ZM6MxUiMz=1zD1DA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 18:29, Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS
Delivery) <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi, thank you for the awesome feature.
>
Thank you for reporting!
> As it may have been discussed, I think the 'name' column in pg_stat_replication_slots is more consistent with the column name and data type matched to the pg_replication_slots catalog.
> The attached patch changes the name and data type of the 'name' column to slot_name and 'name' type, respectively.
It seems a good idea to me. In other system views, we use the name
data type for object name. When I wrote the first patch, I borrowed
the code for pg_stat_slru which uses text data for the name but I
think it's an oversight.
> Also, the macro name PG_STAT_GET_..._CLOS has been changed to PG_STAT_GET_..._COLS.
Good catch!
Here is my comments on the patch:
--- a/src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ CREATE VIEW pg_stat_replication AS
CREATE VIEW pg_stat_replication_slots AS
SELECT
- s.name,
+ s.name AS slot_name,
s.spill_txns,
s.spill_count,
s.spill_bytes,
I think we should modify 'proargnames' of
pg_stat_get_replication_slots() in pg_proc.dat instead.
---
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c
@@ -7094,7 +7094,7 @@ pgstat_replslot_index(const char *name, bool create_it)
Assert(nReplSlotStats <= max_replication_slots);
for (i = 0; i < nReplSlotStats; i++)
{
- if (strcmp(replSlotStats[i].slotname, name) == 0)
+ if (strcmp(replSlotStats[i].slotname.data, name) == 0)
return i; /* found */
}
@@ -7107,7 +7107,7 @@ pgstat_replslot_index(const char *name, bool create_it)
/* Register new slot */
memset(&replSlotStats[nReplSlotStats], 0, sizeof(PgStat_ReplSlotStats));
- memcpy(&replSlotStats[nReplSlotStats].slotname, name, NAMEDATALEN);
+ memcpy(&replSlotStats[nReplSlotStats].slotname.data, name, NAMEDATALEN);
return nReplSlotStats++;
}
We can use NameStr() instead.
---
Perhaps we need to update the regression test as well.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2020-10-12 11:12:29 | Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-10-12 10:49:01 | Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |