From: | Erik Serrano <eserranos(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Holger Jakobs <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: reduce size of table partitioned |
Date: | 2024-01-28 15:11:44 |
Message-ID: | CA+dvXXuyVeiBTgypRuW0OEPe7BqGw_7BSN+KHmkc-idmv95pag@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks Holger,
Greetings
*Erik R. Serrano Saavedra*
*Ingeniero de Sistemas Informáticos*
* Data Base Administrator*
* eserranos(at)gmail(dot)com <eserranos(at)gmail(dot)com>*
* 998596691*
El sáb, 27 ene 2024 a las 11:00, Holger Jakobs (<holger(at)jakobs(dot)com>)
escribió:
> Am 27.01.24 um 14:31 schrieb Erik Serrano:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Good morning, I have a small doubt regarding a partitioned table, which
> has its "mother" table and many "daughter" tables, well the main question
> is... I need to reduce the size of my partitioned table, I can simply
> delete ( drop table) the oldest daughter tables??? or it is not
> recommended....or maybe there is another method to do this??
>
> From already thank you very much
> Greetings
>
>
> *Erik R. Serrano Saavedra*
> *Ingeniero de Sistemas Informáticos*
> * Data Base Administrator*
>
> * eserranos(at)gmail(dot)com <eserranos(at)gmail(dot)com> *
> * 998596691*
>
> see here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-OVERVIEW
>
> Dropping an individual partition using DROP TABLE, or doing ALTER TABLE
> DETACH PARTITION, is far faster than a bulk operation. These commands
> also entirely avoid the VACUUM overhead caused by a bulk DELETE.
>
> -- Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-01-28 17:14:29 | Re: reduce size of table partitioned |
Previous Message | Mahendra Singh | 2024-01-28 05:22:39 | Setup load balancing using HAProxy |