Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Date: 2014-12-09 08:24:29
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLodW0BzEkbOZ5=trk4rc8p4-w-z3o+PuxzQ9iooZOnvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7 December 2014 at 08:21, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:

> Please wait for a few days. The ctidscan module is not adjusted for the
> latest interface yet.

I am in many ways a patient man. At this point it is 12 days since my
request for a working example.

Feedback I am receiving is that the API is unusable. That could be
because it is impenetrable, or because it is unusable. I'm not sure it
matters which.

We need a working example to ensure that the API meets the needs of a
wide section of users and if it does not, to give other users a chance
to request changes to the API so that it becomes usable. The window
for such feedback is approaching zero very quickly now and we need
action.

Thanks

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-12-09 08:52:34 Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-12-09 08:19:56 committsdesc.c not ignored in contrib/pg_xlogdump