| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL Rate Limiting |
| Date: | 2014-01-16 17:03:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLL4pqGE5zxB=BkzaA1OtWVCwfAf4AQ5u6C1AWHPTVY+g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16 January 2014 17:49, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Agreed, but it won't happen in this release. I/O resource control to
>> follow in later releases.
>
> "This release"? TBH, I think this patch has arrived too late to be
> considered for 9.4. It's a fairly major feature and clearly not
> without controversy, so I don't think that posting it for the first
> time the day before CF4 starts meets the guidelines we all agreed
> to back in Ottawa.
I think its majorly useful, but there really isn't much to the
implementation and I expect its beneath the level of being defined as
a major feature. (I think it may have taken less time to write than
this current conversation has lasted).
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-01-16 17:25:51 | Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup |
| Previous Message | Steeve Lennmark | 2014-01-16 17:00:35 | Re: [PATCH] Relocation of tablespaces in pg_basebackup |