Re: WAL Rate Limiting

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL Rate Limiting
Date: 2014-01-16 16:49:38
Message-ID: 29116.1389890978@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Agreed, but it won't happen in this release. I/O resource control to
> follow in later releases.

"This release"? TBH, I think this patch has arrived too late to be
considered for 9.4. It's a fairly major feature and clearly not
without controversy, so I don't think that posting it for the first
time the day before CF4 starts meets the guidelines we all agreed
to back in Ottawa.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steeve Lennmark 2014-01-16 16:53:28 Re: [PATCH] Relocation of tablespaces in pg_basebackup
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-01-16 16:48:49 Re: WAL Rate Limiting